Once again, the world witnesses the signing of a ceasefire agreement between Israel and the Palestinian resistance. While some hold hopes for rebuilding Gaza, skepticism remains widespread among Palestinians, rooted in decades of betrayals.
History demonstrates that Israel has consistently failed to honor its commitments. For the Zionist entity, every truce serves only as a tactical pause—a diplomatic tactic to reorganize the occupation and prepare for further aggression.
The recent ceasefire was no exception: within a few days, the Israeli army, under Benjamin Netanyahu's orders, launched brutal attacks on the Gaza Strip, killing over one hundred Palestinians, including 52 children, 23 women, 4 elderly people, and 7 people with disabilities, citing false claims that Hamas attacked Israeli forces. Hamas denied these accusations and condemned the violations as a deliberate effort to undermine the agreement.
These leaders met at the Sharm El-Sheikh Peace Summit in Egypt on October 13, 2025, amid ongoing efforts to address the conflict.
This cycle of ceasefire and violence reflects a deep-rooted pattern where agreements serve temporary pauses rather than genuine steps toward lasting peace.
The repeated breaches show a persistent pattern that undermines peace efforts, fostering skepticism and prolonging the conflict.
Would you like the tone to be more neutral or critical?