Missouri pays too much for electricity. We deserve market competition

Missouri pays too much for electricity

Overview

Other states give utility customers options, and they’ve seen growth in electricity production and ability to satisfy demand. This guest commentary argues that Missouri should embrace retail electric competition to lower prices and improve service.

Key points

Missouri residents currently face limited choices in electricity providers, which the author claims sustains higher costs.
Proponents of competition contend that allowing customers to choose their electric supplier can stimulate investment in generation and grid infrastructure.
Critics warn that transitioning to full retail competition requires careful regulation to ensure reliability and protect vulnerable customers.
The argument aligns with broader patterns observed in other states where competition correlates with more options and potential price benefits.

Quotes

“Missouri should embrace retail electric competition to lower costs and improve service.”

“Electricity choice would be good for Missouri consumers.”

Counterpoints

Some analyses rate Missouri’s current level of competition as lower than ideal, suggesting room for policy reforms without full market privatization.
Transition plans must address affordability for low-income households and ensure grid reliability during changes.

Author’s stance

The piece advocates for market-driven reform in Missouri’s electricity sector to expand consumer options and drive down prices through competition.

Authorial summary

Missouri should adopt retail electric competition to expand consumer choice and curb prices, while ensuring reliability and protections for vulnerable customers.

The Kansas City Star — 2025-12-07