Josh Hazlewood vs Jasprit Bumrah: Who is a Better Bowler Currently in All Formats?
Josh Hazlewood delivered a match-winning performance in the 2nd T20I against India, sparking debate about whether he is a better bowler than Jasprit Bumrah. During the game at the MCG, Hazlewood was nearly unplayable, dismantling the Indian top order early with his new-ball spell.
He finished with impressive figures of 3 wickets for 13 runs over four overs, dismissing Shubman Gill, Suryakumar Yadav, and Tilak Varma. This dominant spell was pivotal in restricting India to just 125 runs.
India expected their star pacer Jasprit Bumrah to respond similarly, but he struggled initially, conceding runs that eased Australia's chase. Although Bumrah took two wickets, ending with 2 for 26, his performance was less impactful.
"Bumrah is often projected as the best pacer of contemporary cricket; however, the recent performances of these two bowlers raise the question: Is Josh Hazlewood now the better all-format bowler?"
Looking at their careers across formats, Jasprit Bumrah still holds an edge, boasting superior averages and strike rates overall.
Summary
While Hazlewood's recent T20I brilliance highlighted his impact, Bumrah's consistent career stats suggest he remains the more efficient bowler across formats.
Would you like the summary to be more analytical or neutral in tone?