Democrats described the ruling as blocking the White House ballroom security money in the reconciliation package. Officials say the decision could trigger modifications or a 60-vote requirement. Republicans planned revisions after the decision. A trio of aides indicated an alternate path is needed to authorize the ballroom construction. Democrats framed the ruling as a setback for Trump and his administration. Supporters argued the ruling underscores reconciliation constraints. The ruling circulated among lawmakers and staff on Saturday night. Observers say the path forward is unclear without changes. Leaders sought to preserve the plan within rule limits.
A proposal to fund $1 billion in security additions for the White House campus and the president’s new ballroom fails to meet procedural rules KCBS All News 106.9FM and 740AM
www.audacy.comThree congressional aides say lawmakers will need to find another way to authorize construction of the White House ballroom after the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
www.politico.comDemocrats quickly cast the ruling as a defeat for Trump and his administration. Senate Republicans had been seeking $1 billion in taxpayer money for Secret Service security upgrades, including the ballroom, and planned to fold the measure into a massive spending package that is mainly devoted to immigration enforcement. Republicans hold a 53-47 majority, but most legislation still needs 60 votes to pass in the Senate, which gives the parliamentarian’s ruling immediate weight. … MacDonough’s...
www.mogazmasr.comDemocrats announced Saturday night that the Senate's top parliamentary referee had determined that the $1 billion provision did not comply with budget rules.
www.nytimes.comRepublicans say they will try to revise proposal to include the Trump priority in their budget bill.
www.notus.org